← Back to work
Case Study 03 + K-12 Education

Spring
Education Group.

Improving visit-to-inquiry conversion through a research-driven website redesign for a network of K-12 private schools.

Spring Education Group website redesign
Spring Education Group
My Role
UX Designer
Promoted to Senior UX Designer
Time
May 2024 – May 2025
Team Structure
  • 2 UX Designers
  • Director of Web Product Marketing
  • Product Owners
  • Product Managers
  • Engineering and IT Teams

Overview

Spring Education Group operates over 200 private school websites, which serve as the primary way prospective families find and inquire about enrollment. I led the UX redesign of multiple school websites with a focus on improving Visit-to-Inquiry (V2I) conversion and the overall experience for parents.

Using quantitative analytics, heuristic evaluation, competitive analysis, and qualitative research including parent interviews and surveys, we identified key usability barriers and redesigned critical user flows across desktop and mobile.

View Live Site ↗

A network of schools built for families.

Spring Education Group operates a network of private schools across the United States, serving families from early childhood through high school. The organization's websites function as the primary entry point for prospective parents researching and inquiring about enrollment. Each school has their own specific grade level they serve and are geographically spread out across the country.

These websites must:
  • Encourage inquiry submissions
  • Communicate each school's value proposition
  • Build trust with prospective families
Spring Education Group redesigned website mockup

Baseline Analytics

Where users were dropping off.

Before any design work started, I pulled GA4 data to get a clear picture of where things stood year over year. The homepage was picking up more traffic, but overall site sessions were down. Engagement time was ticking up, which told me people were interested once they landed. They just weren't finding what they needed quickly enough to convert.

Google Analytics — May 1–Dec 31, 2024 vs. May 1–Dec 31, 2023 · Landing Page: /
Period Sessions Active Users New Users Avg. Engagement Time Key Events (generate_lead)
All Traffic · Total
May–Dec 2024 331,347 270,850 247,451 1m 06s 13,051
May–Dec 2023 411,715 299,441 290,032 39s 14,076
% Change ↓ −19.52% ↓ −9.55% ↓ −14.68% ↑ +69.37% ↓ −7.28%
Homepage ( / ) Only
May–Dec 2024 77,541 (23.4%) 69,323 (25.59%) 64,807 (26.19%) 43s 1,143 (8.76%)
May–Dec 2023 56,678 (13.77%) 48,119 (16.07%) 43,647 (15.05%) 46s 1,009 (7.17%)
% Change ↑ +36.81% ↑ +44.07% ↑ +48.48% ↓ −6.52% ↑ +13.28%

Listening before designing.

Qualitative Research

We ran surveys and interviews with prospective parents to understand what they were actually looking for when researching schools, what drove their decisions, and what was getting in their way.

Key insights of parents needs:
  • Clear value communication immediately upon landing
  • Faster access to critical information
  • Stronger emotional connection to the school
Survey · First action when learning about a school
Schedule a personalized tour (45%)
Attend an Open House (30%)
Speak with an AO on the phone (25%)
Survey · What is most important to you in a school?
Most
Important
Parents were asked "What is most important to you in a school for your child?"

"I wish I knew more about the curriculum and what makes it different from the other schools in my area."

— Parent, usability session

"I'd love to see images of children actively learning in the classroom and to know what kinds of activities fall within the components of Links to Learning."

— Parent, usability session

"Safety is my biggest concern with my child these days. I want to know how the schools are going to keep my child safe."

— Parent, usability session

Understanding the landscape.

I reviewed competitor school websites to see what they were doing well and where SEG had room to stand out.

Competitors Consistently Include:
Drag to explore · Pinch or scroll to zoom
Competitive analysis of school websites

Iterative approach

From research to wireframes to hi-fi.

Early Concepts and Wireframes

Early on I sketched out wireframes to explore new layout directions that would put value messaging front and center and make it easier for parents to find the inquiry path. I also started experimenting with bringing distinct branding into each school, building color systems tied to each school's identity while keeping accessibility in check.

Iterations and Stakeholder Alignment

We went through several rounds of iteration, bringing designs back to stakeholders regularly and working through their feedback. A few stakeholders were attached to keeping a uniform look across all schools, so we leaned on the research to make the case for why stronger differentiation actually helped parents connect with the right school faster.

WordPress & Technical Constraints

Building within WordPress meant the dev team had to be part of the conversation from day one. I kept everything annotated in Figma Dev Mode and ran weekly syncs with the engineering team so we could catch any technical constraints before they turned into redesign requests.


Final Design & Developer Handoff

Handed off final deliverables using Figma Dev Mode.

Final deliverables included:


All three SEG schools before.

Umbrella school website before redesign
Preschool website before redesign
iK12 school website before redesign

Unified, mobile-first, conversion-focused.

Click each number to see where that design decision lives across both mobile and desktop.

1 Announcement Bar
2 Hero CTA Button
Chesterbrook Academy Preschool redesign, mobile and desktop
1 Value Proposition Block
2 Authentic Photography
3 School Campus Hero
Chesterbrook Academy West Chester redesign
1 Curriculum Accordion
Chesterbrook Academy curriculum page redesign

Outcomes & Results

The redesign moved the numbers.

After launch, we tracked performance from May through December 2025 and compared it to the same period in 2024. Traffic grew significantly across the board, and the homepage in particular saw strong gains in both visits and lead generation.

Key outcome indicators
+22%
Total sessions YoY (404,370 vs 331,347)
+27%
Active users YoY (345,164 vs 270,850)
+21%
Homepage sessions YoY (93,842 vs 77,541)
Google Analytics — May 1–Dec 31, 2025 vs. May 1–Dec 31, 2024 · Landing Page: /
Period Sessions Active Users New Users Avg. Engagement Time Key Events (generate_lead)
All Traffic · Total
May–Dec 2025 404,370 345,164 311,761 1m 00s 12,327
May–Dec 2024 331,347 270,850 247,451 1m 06s 13,051
% Change YoY ↑ +22.04% ↑ +27.44% ↑ +25.99% ↓ −8.6% ↓ −5.55%
Homepage ( / ) Only
May–Dec 2025 93,842 (23.21%) 83,000 (24.05%) 77,947 (25%) 52s 1,162 (9.43%)
May–Dec 2024 77,541 (23.4%) 69,323 (25.59%) 64,807 (26.19%) 43s 1,143 (8.76%)
% Change YoY ↑ +21.02% ↑ +19.73% ↑ +20.28% ↑ +19.28% ↑ +1.66%

What made this hard.

Designing across multiple school brands while keeping everything feeling like it belonged to one system was a real balancing act. Stakeholders had strong opinions, and those didn't always line up with what the research was pointing to.

WordPress also shaped design decisions more than I would have liked. Certain patterns just weren't feasible in the CMS, which meant finding workarounds or simplifying interactions I had originally planned.

Scope crept mid-project, which meant reprioritizing and having honest conversations with stakeholders about what would make it into v1 and what would have to wait.

A career-defining project.

This project was a turning point for me. The scope of the work, the depth of research involved, and the results it produced all played a role in my promotion to Senior UX Designer.

More than anything else I had worked on, this project pushed me to think and operate at a strategic level. Grounding decisions in data, working through competing priorities with stakeholders, and staying with a project from early discovery all the way through post-launch measurement.

What it strengthened in me:
  • Leading UX strategy end-to-end across a large organization
  • Aligning design decisions directly to business goals
  • Translating research insights into measurable outcomes
  • Collaborating cross-functionally across design, product, engineering, and marketing
← Previous Case Study Laurel Springs Ed-Tech Platform Next Case Study → Earth Hero Sustainability App →